|
|||||||
|
All of those keywords (combined) have been searched on google at least 600,000 times on an average and even if Live Search gets 1/10th searches this amount, which is 60,000, it could still get me at least a few hundred hits a month. The weird thing is that I hardly received 10 hits from Live Search in the last month which brings us to one of the following conclusions:
Whatever the reason be, I’m really confused about the potential traffic from Live Search which was yelled in the SEO industry in the past few years, moreover if you were or you were thinking of making efforts to improve your website for Live Search then you can see the result right here. There’s hardly any hope to make money on the internet by running affiliate campaigns on Live Search, unless there is real and legit proof. Related Articles:
top |
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Calvin Richardson said,
I have a feeling Live Search gets minimal amounts of traffic. I’ve noticed that I almost get no traffic from it even though my rankings would be similar to what they are on google. I’ll try and find my actual numbers later to post similar comparisons
[Reply To This Comment]
Go Local SEO said,
We have numerous sites in position one in Live/MSN with absolutely no visitors from Microsoft search. Actually, I can’t ever remember seeing a referral from MSN for any of the many sites we monitor.
Also, it seems that MSN mirrors Yahoo’s search results as the position movements are almost 100% identical.
[Reply To This Comment]
bayu said,
article in this site very grade and benefit for me, am will be save this blog link in my favorite
page and am will be to visit again to here
[Reply To This Comment]
Friendz said,
i think next to google search, msn live search give enough traffic…
[Reply To This Comment]
Chris said,
Live search does the job, but not that we’ll for my part. It’s better if we work it manually. that’s how i see it because it really showed me how worth it working on it.
[Reply To This Comment]
Calvin Richardson said,
So I thought it would be interesting to look at my results from the different search engines. Here’s my numbers for March so far:
google (organic) 13,696 51.31%
yahoo (organic) 7,042 26.38%
msn (organic) 335 1.26%
As you can see from this, MSN is almost inconsequential. It’s roughly 1/50 of Google’s results, whereas Yahoo is 1/2. Show’s how limited MSN’s performance is.
[Reply To This Comment]
bryan said,
I don’t think they get enough traffic to be worthy of consideration. After all, Google has the lion’s share of that market wrapped up.
[Reply To This Comment]
Stu said,
Live Search is becoming a haven for spammers, it apparently places FAR too much emphasis on on page SEO factors, which means when you’ve worked out what it likes, you can feed in thousands of pages which are virtually guaranteed to rank well.
Even for the small amount of users it has, if you can get enough pages indexed and ranking, you can still get some traffic!
[Reply To This Comment]
seo india said,
Live all most lost, not because they poor but others and specially Google is Best, so here pure competition if Live want Search Market Share then it must need to be Best.
[Reply To This Comment]
Rick said,
I’m glad I’m not the only one who is thinking that msn is useless. I have not payed any attention to them in some time, any traffic that comes from msn is incidental at best. Seems like Google (and maybe yahoo) is where its at.
Rick wrote a very interesting post..FatCow $10 OFF Coupon
[Reply To This Comment]
Bing takes off better than expected said,
[...] know what Bing is, Bing is a new search engine introduced by MSN. If you read my last post about live search then you’ll probably know how I started thinking of windows live search as useless. However, [...]
Add A Comment